Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Lung injury in COVID-19 is characterized by neutrophil invasion and the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). An aberrant NET formation may induce local inflammation and increase sputum viscosity. Inhalation of DNase I (dornase alfa) is a treatment option that degrades NETs in the airways. Previous case series have indicated positive clinical effects of inhaled dornase alfa. Methods: Patients admitted to the hospital with acute COVID-19 and hypoxia (oxygen saturation 93% without respiratory support. Results: In total, 76 patients were randomized. The study was stopped when the Omicron virus variant appeared. The clinical response rate did not differ between patients receiving the active substance and placebo. Secondary outcomes were similar across groups, such as mortality, a new episode of hypoxia, length of stay in the hospital, and adverse events. A subanalysis of patients older or younger than 65 years showed no differences in primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Aerosolized dornase alfa failed to improve hypoxia in hospitalized patients with acute COVID-19. The study was conducted during a time of heterogeneity in viral variants and vaccination status of participants. Whether dornase alfa affects the outcomes in other respiratory infections requires further study.
Åkesson et al. (Thu,) studied this question.