Female caregivers exhibited the most heightened cardiovascular and positive affect responses to an induced stress task compared to patients and male caregivers (4.180≤ F ≤8.185, p <.043).
Observational (n=236)
Does gender and patient-versus-caregiver status influence cardiovascular and affective responses to induced stress in colorectal cancer patients and their spousal caregivers?
Female caregivers of colorectal cancer patients exhibit the most heightened cardiovascular and affective responses to induced stress, highlighting the synergistic effects of gender and caregiver status on stress regulation.
p-value: p=<.043
OBJECTIVE: Adults with cancer and their family caregivers have displayed compromised cardiovascular functioning and elevated psychological distress, yet the independent and synergistic roles of gender and patient-versus-caregiver status in their cardiovascular and affective stress responses are yet to be elucidated. METHODS: Patients newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer ( n =118, 56 y old, 36% female, 62% Hispanic, 6.5 mo post-diagnosis) and their spousal caregivers ( n =118, 55 y old, 70% female) underwent a stress induction task that is relevant to close relationships and health issues. Cardiovascular-root mean square of the successive differences, heart rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure- and affective (positive and negative affect, and stress) responses were assessed for their resting, stress reactivity, and recovery patterns. RESULTS: Stress induction was successfully noted in both cardiovascular and affective markers. General linear modeling for repeated measures revealed that the synergistic effects of gender and patient-versus-caregiver status in root mean square of the successive differences, heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, and positive affect responses (4.180≤ F ≤8.185, p <.043), with female caregivers showing the most heightened responses. Caregivers reported greater stress reactivity in negative affect than patients ( F =28.046, p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the independent and synergistic effects of gender and patient-versus-caregiver roles in cardiovascular stress regulation. The findings also suggest the different ways in which gender shapes cardiovascular and affective phenotypes in stress situations, which may impact the etiology and progression of premature morbidities in this vulnerable population. OSF REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P5MHU.
Kim et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Colorectal cancer and spousal caregivers (n=236). Stress induction task vs. Patient versus caregiver status and gender differences was evaluated on Cardiovascular (RMSSD, HR, SBP, DBP) and affective responses to stress induction (p=<.043). Female caregivers exhibited the most heightened cardiovascular and positive affect responses to an induced stress task compared to patients and male caregivers (4.180≤ F ≤8.185, p <.043).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: