Background and aim: Gynecological cancers, including ovarian, cervical, and uterine cancers, are among the most prevalent malignancies affecting women globally. Patients with these cancers frequently encounter substantial physical, psychological, and social challenges. This systematic review aims to evaluate the existing quantitative evidence on palliative care interventions that offer coping skills that facilitate the quality of life and psychological well-being of women with Gynecological Cancers. Method: PubMed, Google Scholar, Clinical Key, and Cochrane Reviews databases were searched from 2000 to 2024. Articles in English with quantitative evidence were screened to determine whether the population included women with gynecological cancers, whether interventions were related to offering coping skills, whether control groups were available, and whether outcomes were related to psychological well-being and quality of life. Data were extracted to report on intervention models, outcome measures, and intervention outcomes. The risk of bias on randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selection of outcomes for reporting, and other biases was assessed by using the RoB 2, ROBINS I, and ROBINS E. Two independent reviewers were involved in all the above steps, with a third contributing to solving discrepancies. Meta-analysis was not done following heterogeneity assessments. Results: Searches returned 297 unique articles, with twelve being for review. There were eight randomized controlled trials (RCT), two quasi-experimental trials, one cohort study, and one comparative study. The interventions or exposures included: group therapy based on coping strategies, supportive and coordinated care, communication therapies, mindfulness sessions, educational sessions, psychological counseling, and use of engagement in active coping and seeking social support. Seven studies measured psychological outcomes, six using multidimensional instruments. Five studies measured quality of life, and three used multidimensional instruments. Across the evaluated outcomes, the results consistently and significantly indicated benefits linked to providing coping skills. The majority of RCTs show significant (<0.05) improvement in quality of life with the coping skills from the baseline to the endpoint as interval measures and Growth curve analyses based on the intent-to-treat approach showed that participants in both the coping and communication-enhancing intervention (CCI) and supportive counseling (SC) groups reported lower levels of depressive symptoms compared to those receiving usual care In the Quasi-experimental trials survival expectancy by group interaction (β = 5.102, P = 0.044) was significant as well the patients who survived throughout the study, changes in FACT-G score were greater over time for patients with high survival expectancy in the treatment group compared to with all other patients. Conclusion: Palliative care interventions offering coping skills are effective in supporting women with gynecological cancers. These interventions significantly contribute to enhancing their mental and emotional well-being and overall quality of life.
Illangasinghe et al. (Thu,) studied this question.