Topic. The article was prepared on the basis of an analysis of axiological aspects of the implementation of artificial intelligence (hereinafter referred to as AI), ethical problems arising from its use, including in litigation, and was prepared on the basis of regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation and foreign countries in the digital sphere, multilateral agreements on the use of AI, as well as scientific literature. The work considers not only approaches to legal regulation, but also presents the features of the development and implementation of AI in different countries, defines the role of multilateral agreements of large companies in the field of AI use, as well as the need to revise the current legislation. Objectives. The purpose of the article is to compare legal regulation and approaches to the implementation of AI, including in judicial activities, in different countries based on the analysis of regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation and foreign countries, to identify problems of legal regulation and uncertainties in this area for subsequent resolution. Methodology. In the process of analyzing scientific approaches to the implementation of AI and legislation in various countries, formal legal and comparative legal methods, theoretical analysis, including scientific literature were used. Thus, the risks of using AI were identified, including ethical ones, a comparison of approaches to legal regulation in different countries was made, the content of agreements on the development and use of AI was determined, etc. Results/conclusions. Relations related to the implementation of AI technologies continue to be one of the unregulated areas in many states. The novelty of this scientific work is expressed in the relevance of the topic under consideration, which is due to the time and rapid development of AI, introduced into many areas of society, as well as in the formation of proposals for improving the legislation of the Russian Federation, filling the gaps in legal regulation, which, given the widespread use of AI-based technologies, is a necessary measure. Also, due to the fact that these legal relations are currently regulated to a greater extent by multilateral agreements, it is necessary to develop requirements for them, including in order to maintain a balance of interests of AI developers and its users. In addition, it is proposed to enshrine the concept of AI in legislation, determine responsibility for actions performed with the help of AI, enshrine AI as an object of civil rights and add its concept, criteria for classifying an object as AI and its legal regime to the legislation.
Petyukova et al. (Mon,) studied this question.