General Background: Effective public administration relies heavily on the competence of managerial personnel. Specific Background: In Uzbekistan, reforms emphasize forming a professional civil service corps aligned with modern governance standards. Knowledge Gap: Despite existing assessment frameworks, subjectivity, lack of digital integration, and inconsistent criteria hinder accurate evaluation of leadership potential. Aims: This study aims to improve the mechanisms for assessing the management competence of civil service leaders through evidence-based, competency-focused, and technologically supported methods. Results: The analysis reveals that international best practices, such as 360-degree feedback, digital platforms, and psychometric assessments, offer more objective and comprehensive evaluations. Novelty: The proposed model integrates global methodologies with localized needs, advocating for strategic foresight, emotional intelligence, and ethical standards in leadership assessment. Implications: Implementing a multi-dimensional, transparent evaluation system could enhance public service quality, reduce corruption, and ensure strategic leadership continuity in Uzbekistan’s civil administration.Highlight : Modern assessment methods like 360-degree feedback and digital platforms enhance objectivity in leadership evaluations. Competency-based models help identify both strengths and development areas for public service managers. Accurate leadership assessment supports building a professional talent reserve aligned with strategic governance goals. Keywords : Civil Service, Management Personnel, Management Capacity, Evaluation Mechanisms, Management Competencies
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rafikova Ziyodakhan Akmaljonovna
Academia Open
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rafikova Ziyodakhan Akmaljonovna (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1b19954b1d3bfb60e9199 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.10.2025.11555
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: