Green hydrogen derived from renewable resources is increasingly recognized as a basis for future low-carbon energy systems. This study presents a comprehensive techno-environmental comparison of two thermochemical conversion pathways utilizing biomethane: steam methane reforming (SMR) and chemical looping reforming (CLR). Through integrated process simulations, compositional analyses, energy modeling, and cost evaluation, we examine the comparative advantages of each route in terms of hydrogen yield, carbon separation efficiency, process energy intensity, and economic performance. The results demonstrate that CLR achieves a significantly higher hydrogen concentration in the raw syngas stream (62.44%) than SMR (43.14%), with reduced levels of residual methane and carbon monoxide. The energy requirements for hydrogen production are lower in the CLR system, averaging 1.2 MJ/kg, compared to 3.2 MJ/kg for SMR. Furthermore, CLR offers a lower hydrogen production cost (USD 4.3/kg) compared to SMR (USD 6.4/kg), primarily due to improved thermal integration and the absence of solvent-based CO2 capture. These insights highlight the potential of CLR as a next-generation reforming strategy for producing green hydrogen. To advance its technology readiness, it is proposed to develop a pilot-scale CLR facility to validate system performance under operational conditions and support the pathway to commercial implementation.
Yunus et al. (Mon,) studied this question.