The article determines that active globalization processes, as well as Ukraine’s desire to become a full member of the European Union, challenge the foundations of the protection and defense of intellectual property rights, which under modern conditions are not limited to a territorial nature, but are an integral part of international trade and the global economy. Attention is focused on the fact that the modern model of intellectual property protection is losing the features of a purely national mechanism and is becoming an integral part of the global economy, international investment processes and interstate cooperation. The author emphasizes that the private law nature of the institution of intellectual property is gaining special importance in light of the need to ensure effective judicial protection of rights to intellectual property objects. It is emphasized that Ukraine must respond to new threats caused by both war and international challenges, creating effective mechanisms for the protection of intellectual property rights. In this context, legislative initiatives are considered to establish and launch the High Court for Intellectual Property as a specialized body of justice capable of ensuring effective and timely protection of property and non-property rights in this area. It is argued that the activities of such a court are an important condition for the formation of a favorable investment climate and support for the post-war recovery of Ukraine. The author of the article has determined the vector of development of legislative initiatives to establish and ensure the activities of the High Court for Intellectual Property. The need to put the Court’s mechanism into action is argued, taking into account the crucial role of investment activity in the context of the post-war recovery of Ukraine. It is emphasized that in the conditions of the post-war recovery of the Ukrainian economy, where foreign investment will play a leading role, ensuring reliable judicial protection of intellectual rights will become a determining factor in the investment attractiveness of the state.
V. V. Khuda (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: