Background/Objectives: This study presents a survey-based evaluation of an explainable AI(Feature-Augmented) approach, which was designed to support the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) by integrating clinical data, MMSE scores, and MRI scans. The approach combines rule-based reasoning and example-based visualization to improve the explainability of AI-generated decisions. Methods: Five doctors participated in the survey: two with 6 to 10 years of experience and three with more than 10 years of experience in the medical field and expertise in AD. The participants evaluated different AI outputs, including clinical feature-based interpretations, MRI-based visual heat maps, and a combined interpretation approach. Results: The model achieved a 100% trust score, with 20% of the participants reporting full trust and 80% expressing conditional trust, understanding the diagnosis but seeking further clarification. Overall, the participants reported that the integrated explanation format improved their understanding of the model decisions and enhanced their confidence in using AI-assisted diagnosis. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this paper is the first to gather the views of medical experts to evaluate the explainability of an AI decision-making model when diagnosing AD. These preliminary findings suggest that explainability plays a key role in building trust and ease of use of AI tools in clinical settings, especially when used by experienced clinicians to support complex diagnoses, such as AD.
Al-bakri et al. (Sun,) studied this question.