Abstract We compare the excitation of the Narrow-Line Region (NLR) of type 1 and type 2 QSOs for redshifts 0.4 ≤ z ≤ 0.5 via the analysis of their emission line properties in Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) near-UV/optical spectra. We fit the continuum and emission lines, using two kinematic components for O iiiλ5007 and Hβ (narrow and broad) and a single component for the weaker lines. We find two main differences in the NLR excitation of type 1 and 2 QSOs: (i) QSOs 2 have higher O iii/Hβ than QSOs 1 in both narrow and broad components; (ii) QSOs 1 present higher Ne v, Ne iii and O iiiλ4363 luminosities, higher Ne v/Ne iii and Ne iii/O ii ratios and higher temperatures than QSOs 2. These differences support more highly excited regions, higher temperature gas and prevalence of shocks in type 1 relative to type 2 QSOs. We suggest two possible scenarios: (i) type 1 QSOs are seen more pole-on, allowing the observation of more highly excited gas closer to the nucleus, supporting the Unified Model scenario; (ii) evolution from type 2 to type 1 QSOs, with highest excitation regions obscured in type 2’s and cleared up in a “blow-out phase”. Support for the evolutionary scenario is given by the usually higher LO iii in QSOs 2, in the sense that these sources host a more powerful AGN that, in its evolution, clears up the excess dust and gas to reveal a lower-luminosity but more highly excited type 1 AGN.
Hauschild-Roier et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: