Background and Aims: The increasing number of Chinese learners studying Thai has emphasized the need for effective teaching strategies that integrate comparative linguistics. The linguistic differences and similarities between Thai and Chinese significantly impact language acquisition, requiring a structured pedagogical approach to enhance learning outcomes. This study aims to: (1) Analyze the phonetic, grammatical, and lexical challenges faced by Chinese learners of Thai. (2) Evaluate the effectiveness of comparative linguistics in curriculum design and instructional materials. And (3) Propose teaching strategies that align with the linguistic and cognitive needs of Chinese learners. Methodology: A comparative linguistic analysis of Thai and Chinese was conducted, focusing on phonetics, syntax, and vocabulary. Data was gathered through classroom observations, learner assessments, and expert interviews. A mixed-methods approach was applied, combining quantitative performance analysis with qualitative feedback from students and educators. Results: (1) The study identified major linguistic barriers, including tonal differences, word order variations, and morphological inconsistencies. (2) Comparative linguistics-based strategies significantly improved learners' comprehension and pronunciation. (3) The integration of bilingual instructional methods, digital tools, and interactive learning models enhanced student engagement and learning retention. Conclusion: The findings confirm that comparative linguistics is a crucial framework for developing effective teaching methodologies for Chinese learners of Thai. The study highlights the importance of tailored pedagogy that incorporates cross-linguistic analysis, interactive learning, and technology-driven instruction. Future research should explore longitudinal studies on the impact of these methodologies and their applicability to other foreign language learners.
Yang Li (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: