We study a finite-horizon optimal job-switching and portfolio allocation problem where an agent faces a mandatory retirement date. The agent can freely switch between two jobs with differing levels of income and leisure. The financial market consists of a risk-free asset and a risky asset, with the agent making dynamic consumption, investment, and job-switching decisions to maximize lifetime utility. The utility function follows a Cobb–Douglas form, incorporating both consumption and leisure preferences. Using a dual-martingale approach, we derive the optimal policies and establish a verification theorem confirming their optimality. Our results provide insights into the trade-offs between labor income and leisure over a finite career horizon and their implications for retirement planning and investment behavior.
Kim et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: