Underwater acoustic source localization is formulated as a feature learning problem within a machine learning framework, where a data-driven approach directly extracts source distance features from hydroacoustic signals. This study systematically compares the localization performance of four machine learning models—decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and feedforward neural network (FNN) models—in both classification and regression tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that, in classification tasks, all algorithms achieve effective localization under high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions, while the DT model exhibits significant noise sensitivity in low-SNR scenarios; regression tasks show reduced model convergence overall, with only the SVM and RF models maintaining basic localization capabilities at a high SNR. For two-dimensional localization, machine learning classification algorithms are employed, revealing systematic accuracy degradation compared to one-dimensional scenarios, where only the RF and SVM models demonstrate practical value under high-SNR conditions. Validation using measured data from the SWellEx-96 experiment’s S5 event confirms that when constructing datasets with frequency-domain acoustic pressure features from the final 35 min segment, the classification task-driven DT, RF, and SVM models all demonstrate reliable localization performance, benefiting from the inherent high-SNR characteristics of the data.
Yuan et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: