ABSTRACT Technology adoption models are widely applied to examine factors influencing the use of computer‐assisted audit techniques and tools (CAATTs). However, these models do not incorporate audit risk components and the risk‐based approach embedded in auditing standards, limiting their relevance to the auditing domain. This study addresses this gap through a qualitative analysis based on an exploratory study and semistructured interviews with audit professionals from 16 accountancy firms that audit public companies. The findings identify key determinants, related to audit risk factors, that shape CAATTs adoption decisions within the context of financial audits. These determinants reflect the unique regulatory and risk‐oriented environment of auditing, distinguishing it from general technology adoption in other industries. The study also proposes a risk‐based decision‐making framework aligned with auditing standards to support effective CAATTs adoption. Notable differences were found between large and small firms, driven by variations in senior management perceptions, access to technological resources and capacity for training and knowledge sharing. The findings offer practical implications for auditors, standard‐setters and developers seeking to enhance CAATTs integration and audit quality through a deeper understanding of audit‐specific contextual factors.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
International Journal of Auditing
Ariel University
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Cohen et al. (Wed,) studied this question.