It is indicated that both in Ukraine and internationally there is no established judicial practice on the consideration of such cases. The issue of intellectual rights to the results of the creative activity of artificial intelligence is characterized by significant complexity and the lack of a unified approach to the solution. The legislative framework of most states does not have time to adapt to dynamic technological progress, as a result of which the legal issues of authorship of works created by AI remain the subject of active discussions. The article examines the problems associated with the legislative regulation of the sphere of intellectual property. Among such problems are the high level of illegal use of intellectual property, violation of the right to a copyrighted work, insufficient protection of intellectual property, and a low level of justice. In connection with the development of high technologies of artificial intelligence, special attention is paid to the problems faced by the intellectual property system, in particular copyright and the very definition of authorship. The emphasis is on the features of the technology, which is characterized by the ability to self-learn and autonomously make creative decisions. It is noted that the problem has practical significance, since the results of artificial intelligence are already used for commercial purposes. The authors set themselves two tasks: first, to investigate content of the terms “artificial intelligence” and “copyright” in modern academic discourse; second, to propose certain changes to the legislation, taking into account the analysis of scientific opinions. An important task for the legislator is to bring the regulatory legal acts in the field of intellectual property into line with European and international standards, since integration into the European community in today’s conditions is an extremely urgent problem for our state. The article analyzes the main provisions of the Law of Ukraine «On Copyright and Related Rights» and the «Law on Artificial Intelligence» of the European Union. The need for further harmonization of legislation in the field of intellectual property with the norms of European Union legislation, elimination of gaps in current legislation related to the implementation and protection of intellectual property rights, taking into account international experience, is emphasized.
Pyroha et al. (Sat,) studied this question.