The article explores narratives of traumatic historical events presented in Japanese museums of historical memory, with a particular focus on representations related to Japan's involvement in World War II and its colonial past. Utilizing theoretical frameworks of historical memory as a form of social construction and symbolic politics, the authors analyze museum exhibitions as tools for disseminating specific historical narratives, which significantly influence contemporary public discourse and collective identity in Japan. The research is structured around an analysis of four representative case studies: the Yushukan Museum, the Memorial Museum for Soldiers, Detainees in Siberia, and Postwar Repatriates, the Northern Territories Museum, and the Women's Active Museum on War and Peace. Each museum reflects distinct mnemonic traditions—radical conservative, moderate conservative, and progressive—and employs varied strategies and methodologies to convey their particular historical narratives. Through these case studies, the article identifies five ideal-typical memory models as defined by Matteo Dian: glorification of the past, self-victimization, historical amnesia, acknowledgment of guilt, and genuine repentance. The analysis demonstrates how each museum utilizes different representational mechanisms—such as textual information, visual displays, personal narratives, and emotional appeals—to foster specific interpretations of history. The authors argue that the diversity of historical narratives within Japanese memory museums results from competing mnemonic traditions and actors within society, including political parties, government institutions, religious organizations, and civic groups. The coexistence of state-supported and private museums further reinforces narrative pluralism. This pluralism reflects ongoing societal debates around Japan's wartime actions and continues to shape national identity, historical consciousness, and international relations.
Streltsov et al. (Sun,) studied this question.