Abstract. Subglacial topography beneath the Greenland Ice Sheet is a fundamental control on its dynamics and response to changes in the climate system. Yet, it remains challenging to measure directly, and existing representations of the subglacial topography rely on a limited number of observations. Although the use of mass conservation and the development of BedMachine Greenland substantially improved the representation of the bed topography, this approach is limited to fast-flowing sectors and is less effective in regions with complex, alpine topography. As an alternative to traditional numerical methods, recent work has explored using Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), constrained by only one physical law, to solve forward and inverse problems in ice sheet modeling. Building on this work, we assess three PINN frameworks constrained by distinct conservation laws, showing that PINNs informed with a single conservation law are not sufficient for regions with sparse measurements and complex topographies. To that end, we introduce a novel approach that involves coupling two conservation laws within a PINN framework to infer the subglacial topography and test this approach for three regions with distinct environments in Greenland. This PINN is trained with both the conservation of mass and an approximation of the conservation of momentum (the Shelfy-Stream Approximation), which allows us to simultaneously infer the ice thickness and basal shear stress using observations of ice velocities, surface elevation, and the apparent mass balance in a mixed inversion problem. We compare the predicted ice thickness to ground-truth ice-penetrating radar measurements of ice thickness, showing that the PINN informed with two conservation laws is capable of inferring ice thickness in sparsely surveyed regions. Furthermore, comparisons of predicted bed topographies with BedMachine Greenland show that this approach is capable of discovering new bed features in slower-moving regions and in regions of complex topography, highlighting its potential for better constraining the bed topography of the Greenland Ice Sheet.
Krishna et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: