Tight sandstone reservoirs generally exhibit poor physical properties and characterization of microscopic pore structure is crucial for evaluating reservoir quality and fluid flow behavior. Fractal dimension provides an effective means to quantify the complexity and heterogeneity of pore structures in such reservoirs. This study investigates tight sandstone reservoirs of the Kongdian Formation in the Nanpi Slope, Cangdong Sag, using cast thin sections, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-pressure mercury injection (HPMI), and constant-rate mercury injection (CRMI) experiments. We establish a full-range fractal model to characterize pore-throat distributions and elucidate the correlation between fractal dimensions and reservoir properties, alongside factors influencing pore-structure heterogeneity. Key findings include that (1) pore types are predominantly residual intergranular pores, intergranular dissolution pores, and clay mineral intercrystalline pores, with throats primarily consisting of sheet-like and curved sheet-like types, exhibiting strong pore-structure heterogeneity; (2) full-range fractal dimensions D1, D2 and D4 effectively characterize the heterogeneity of pore structure, where higher D1 and D2 values correlate with increased macro–mega pore and micro-fine throat abundance, respectively, indicating enhanced pore connectivity and superior flow capacity, while elevated D4 reflects greater nano throat complexity, degrading reservoir properties and impeding hydrocarbon flow; (3) compared to conventional methods splicing HPMI and CRMI data at 0.12 μm, the fractal-derived integration point more accurately resolves full-range pore-throat distributions, revealing significant disparities in pore-throat size populations; (4) the fractal dimensions D1, D2, and D4 are collectively governed by clay mineral content, average throat radius, displacement pressure, and tortuosity.
Zhou et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: