This study examines the Christian ethical dilemma surrounding the application of the death penalty for drug dealers in Indonesia. Although Law No. 35/2009 stipulates capital punishment for major narcotics crimes, drug abuse rates remain high, raising questions about its effectiveness. From a Christian ethical perspective, the issue is contentious—while the Old Testament supports retributive justice for grave offenses, the New Testament emphasizes love, forgiveness, and opportunities for repentance. Using a qualitative descriptive approach with normative-theological and legal frameworks, this research analyzes theological arguments, legal provisions, and moral implications of capital punishment in drug-related crimes. Findings reveal that while proponents view the death penalty as a deterrent and a means of protecting society, opponents argue it contradicts Christian values of grace and rehabilitation, risks irreversible injustice, and fails to address root causes. The study concludes that a rehabilitative and restorative justice approach, aligned with Christian principles of love and justice, offers a more holistic and humane alternative for addressing drug trafficking in Indonesia.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eka Herodian Beis
Christopher Dephelin Parapat
Nikodemus Sarumaha
MAHABBAH Journal of Religion and Education
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Beis et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6cd6bb1249cec298b3c85 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.47135/mahabbah.v5i1.130
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: