Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in Natural Language Processing (NLP), yet their cross-lingual performance consistency remains a significant challenge. This paper introduces a novel methodology for efficiently identifying inherent cross-lingual weaknesses in LLMs. Our approach leverages beam search and LLM-based simulation to generate bilingual question pairs that expose performance discrepancies between English and target languages. We construct a new dataset of over 6,000 bilingual pairs across 16 languages using this methodology, demonstrating its effectiveness in revealing weaknesses even in state-of-the-art models. The extensive experiments demonstrate that our method precisely and cost-effectively pinpoints cross-lingual weaknesses, consistently revealing over 50\% accuracy drops in target languages across a wide range of models. Moreover, further experiments investigate the relationship between linguistic similarity and cross-lingual weaknesses, revealing that linguistically related languages share similar performance patterns and benefit from targeted post-training. Code is available at https://github.com/xzx34/Cross-Lingual-Pitfalls.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xu Zhang
Yanbo Wang
Yue Huang
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68da58d8c1728099cfd11170 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.18673
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: