The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has unveiled unexpectedly massive galaxy candidates at high redshifts, challenging standard ΛCDM cosmological predictions. In this work, we study the predictions of more realistic dark matter halo models combined with modified matter power spectra for interpreting JWST observations of high-redshift galaxies. We employ three halo mass functions: the conventional Sheth-Tormen (ST) model and two physically motivated alternatives introduced by Del Popolo (DP1 and DP2). Our analysis of cumulative stellar mass densities at z 8--10 reveals that the standard ST mass function systematically underpredicts JWST observations, achieving marginal consistency only with high star formation efficiencies. In contrast, the DP1 and DP2 models demonstrate significantly improved agreement with observations even within standard ΛCDM, with statistical consistency within 1--2σ for moderate star formation efficiencies. When combined with modified power spectra, these refined halo models achieve suitable agreement with JWST data across broad parameter ranges, particularly for steeper spectral indices that amplify high-mass halo formation. Crucially, we find that moderate star formation efficiencies coupled with small-scale power enhancements provide robust reconciliation between theory and observations, eliminating the need for extreme astrophysical assumptions. Our results demonstrate that incorporating realistic halo collapse physics, often neglected in standard analyses, can substantially alleviate apparent tensions between JWST observations and ΛCDM predictions, highlighting the critical importance of small-scale structure formation physics in early cosmic epochs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Saeed Fakhry
Reyhaneh Vojoudi Salmani
Javad T. Firouzjaee
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fakhry et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7103b90569dd607ee6a33 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2507.23742
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: