The relationship between non-profit organizations and the state is inherently dynamic—marked by cooperation, dependency, and contestation. This article examines how NGOs navigate diverse political contexts, from corporatist welfare systems to restrictive and hybrid regimes. It analyzes typologies of NGO–state relations encompassing partnership, co-optation, and repression, emphasizing how these arrangements shape organizational autonomy and civic resilience. Drawing on comparative examples from Scandinavia, China, Russia, and India, the discussion reveals that NGO independence is negotiated rather than absolute, conditioned by state funding, regulation, and political discourse. The article advances the concept of “principled pragmatism” as a strategy through which NGOs balance collaboration with advocacy, safeguarding mission fidelity while adapting to political realities. This framework contributes to the broader understanding of civil society’s resilience under both supportive and hostile governance regimes.
Anna Neya Kazanskaia (Wed,) studied this question.