Background: The Circle of Willis (COW) has historically been regarded as a crucial collateral pathway ensuring cerebral perfusion during arterial obstruction. However, its true role as a functional unit remains debated, given the frequent anatomical variations and inconsistent clinical protection against ischemic events. Methods: This review integrates historical accounts, anatomical and morphological studies, hemodynamic analyses, computational modeling, and clinical observations. Evidence was synthesized to evaluate the structural variability of the COW, its hemodynamic behavior, and its clinical relevance in cerebrovascular disease. Results: Anatomical investigations show that a complete and symmetric COW is relatively rare, with hypoplasia and absence of key segments being common. Hemodynamic studies and computational simulations demonstrate that collateral efficiency depends on vessel diameter, branching geometry, pressure gradients, and vascular compliance, rather than anatomical presence alone. Clinical findings reveal paradoxes: patients with a morphologically intact COW may still experience severe ischemia, whereas incomplete variants may maintain adequate perfusion through alternative collateral routes. Conclusion: The COW should be viewed as a conditional, context-dependent reserve system rather than a continuously active circulatory safeguard. Its collateral role emerges predominantly under pathological stress and is constrained by individual vascular geometry and hemodynamic conditions. Advances in imaging and patient-specific computational modeling hold promise for bridging the gap between morphology and functional competence, with potential to improve risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making in cerebrovascular care.
Dzmitry et al. (Tue,) studied this question.