Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the association of adenomyosis subtypes defined by ultrasound using the revised Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) criteria, with reproductive and obstetric outcomes following frozen embryo transfer (FET). Methods This retrospective, single‐center cohort study included women who underwent their first FET cycle, as well as transvaginal ultrasound evaluation for the diagnosis of adenomyosis using the revised MUSA criteria, between August 2022 and June 2024. We included only FET cycles in which transferred embryos were of high quality. Adenomyosis subtypes were defined as follows: external (confined to the outer myometrium), internal (involving the inner myometrium, corresponding to the endometrial–myometrial junction, and/or the middle myometrium) and mixed (affecting both inner and outer myometrium). Controls were selected from women without ultrasound evidence of adenomyosis who underwent FET during the same period. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed using patient age, body mass index, anti‐Müllerian hormone level, infertility type, embryo stage, cause of infertility, FET protocol and number of embryos transferred. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess differences in reproductive and obstetric outcomes in women with adenomyosis, both overall and its subtypes, vs matched controls. The primary outcome was live birth, defined as delivery of at least one live infant at ≥ 28 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes were: implantation, clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, early pregnancy loss (< 12 weeks), late pregnancy loss (12–28 weeks), multiple pregnancy, preterm birth (< 37 weeks), low birth weight (< 2500 g), fetal growth restriction, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, placenta accreta, placental abruption, premature rupture of membranes and delivery by Cesarean section. Results Of 4146 eligible women, 879 with adenomyosis and 879 matched controls without adenomyosis were included in the analysis. Their age ranged from 20 to 42 years. The rate of live birth was significantly lower in the group with adenomyosis compared to controls (35.38% vs 45.16%, P < 0.001; odds ratio (OR), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55–0.81)). Women with external adenomyosis, accounting for over 50% of cases, had a live‐birth rate comparable with that of their matched controls (45.80% vs 46.85%, P = 0.795; OR, 0.96 (95% CI 0.74–1.24)), whereas the live‐birth rate was significantly lower for women with internal adenomyosis (27.44% vs 42.33%, P = 0.002; OR, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.34–0.77)) and even lower for those with mixed‐type adenomyosis (18.09% vs 44.15%, P < 0.001; OR, 0.28 (95% CI, 0.17–0.45)) compared with controls. The rate of early pregnancy loss was higher in adenomyosis patients compared with controls (22.25% vs 15.65% of clinical pregnancies, P = 0.011; OR, 1.54 (95% CI, 1.10–2.15)). There were no significant differences in most of the other secondary outcomes in women with a live birth, between those with adenomyosis and controls. However, subgroup analysis revealed several significant associations between adenomyosis phenotypes, mainly internal and mixed‐type adenomyosis, and specific obstetric outcomes. Conclusions Adenomyosis, particularly internal and mixed‐type, is associated with a reduced live‐birth rate and an increased risk of early pregnancy loss in those achieving clinical pregnancy following FET. Ultrasound‐based phenotyping of adenomyosis prior to FET may support individualized assisted reproductive technology management. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results. © 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Wang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: