Multi-agent systems, systems with multiple independent AI agents working together to achieve a common goal, are becoming increasingly prevalent in daily life. Drawing inspiration from the phenomenon of human group social influence, we investigate whether a group of AI agents can create social pressure on users to agree with them, potentially changing their stance on a topic. We conducted a study in which participants discussed social issues with either a single or multiple AI agents, and where the agents either agreed or disagreed with the user's stance on the topic. We found that conversing with multiple agents increased the social pressure felt by participants, and caused a greater shift in opinion towards the agents' stances on the conversation topics. Our study shows the potential advantages of multi-agent systems over single-agent platforms in causing opinion change. We discuss the resulting possibilities for multi-agent systems that promote social good, as well as potential malicious actors using these systems to manipulate public opinion.
Song et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: