Background: Routine early surgery for all deep burns in low-resource settings is not currently achievable. We designed and implemented a simple triage strategy that selected patients to be prioritised for early surgery based on a more urgent need and greater potential benefit. The primary outcome was the ability to perform surgery in the priority group within three days of the decision. Methods: This was a prospective, descriptive study undertaken at a tertiary hospital in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. All patients referred to the Grey’s Hospital Burn Service were triaged into either priority or non-priority groups. Priority designation was based on total burn surface area (TBSA) > 15%, the presence of sepsis, or limb-threatening injury. Data related to demographic information, injury, and outcomes were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools. Results: There were 191 admissions with 42 (22%) meeting priority criteria. The priority group had larger burns (TBSA 25 Interquartile range 15–30 vs. 8 3–15%) and included all septic injuries. We provided early surgery within a median of 1.4 (interquartile range 0.5–3.3) days of the decision for surgery being made. A total of 75% of patients were operated within 72 h of the decision, and 43% within 10 days of injury. The system identified a sicker cohort, as evidenced by high mortality, ICU admission, and acute kidney injury rates. In the non-priority group, reported outcomes were more positive, but with a high injury-to-discharge days per percentage TBSA. Conclusions: This simple triage strategy represents a novel approach for prioritising access to burn surgery in a setting where global surgery standards are desirable but not always possible. We were able to identify the high-risk groups and provide surgery within acceptable time frames. Future research should be aimed at refining this triage system and improving outcomes in the priority group.
Allorto et al. (Fri,) studied this question.