Breast cancer remains a major global health challenge. In 2022, there were an estimated 2.3 million new cases and 670,000 deaths among women worldwide. Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer accounts for approximately 70% of breast cancer diagnoses. The treatment landscape for advanced HR+)/HER2− breast cancer has been transformed by the introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first-line setting. However, therapeutic strategies following progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors remain heterogeneous and uncertainty exists in their optimal integration in clinical practice. This review aims to systematically examine available second-line and subsequent treatment options for HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors, with a focus on biomarker-driven strategies and emerging therapies. The therapeutic landscape beyond CDK4/6 inhibitors includes targeted agents guided by actionable biomarkers as well as novel selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs). In biomarker-unselected populations, options include CDK4/6 continuation strategies, endocrine monotherapy in selected cases, and cytotoxic therapy. The integration of molecular testing via next-generation sequencing has become standard of care in guiding these decisions. However, overlapping molecular alterations and a lack of consensus on treatment sequencing pose significant challenges. Prognostic factors such as circulating tumor DNA dynamics may further refine treatment personalization. Post-CDK4/6 therapy in HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer is an evolving and increasingly complex area of practice. Optimal treatment selection should be tailored to both tumor biology and patient-specific factors, supported by molecular testing and high-quality evidence.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dana Narváez
David W. Cescon
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
University Health Network
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Narváez et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68ff87e9c8c50a61f2bdd1e9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110366