Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This commentary examines the systemic failures within Nepal’s labor migration governance framework, arguing these are primary drivers of the pervasive exploitation and human rights abuses confronting Nepali migrant workers, particularly in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states and Malaysia. Grounded in an extensive review of academic literature and institutional reports, and significantly informed by insights from the author’s sustained, research-based engagement with Nepali migrant communities, this analysis reveals critical vulnerabilities systematically intensified by insufficient pre-departure safeguards, fraudulent recruitment practices often fueled by a fragmented and captured policy network, and chronically weak enforcement protocols. The commentary further illuminates the “double jeopardy” confronting climate-displaced individuals and women migrants, who navigate distinctly compounded and often gender-specific risks. It scrutinizes the limitations of existing legal and protection mechanisms in both Nepal and destination countries, highlighting the critical disjuncture between policy rhetoric and lived realities. Consequently, this work calls for urgent, multi-pronged reforms: strengthening national regulatory oversight, enforcing ethical recruitment through robust bilateral and international cooperation, and ensuring accessible justice for aggrieved workers. Ultimately, it advocates for a fundamental reorientation of migration governance towards a rights-centered paradigm, ensuring that labor migration becomes a genuine pathway to dignity and empowerment, rather than perpetuating cycles of human suffering and exploitation.
Animesh Ghimire (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: