Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Strategic foresight often involves navigating deeply uncertain futures through scenario-based reasoning. Traditional methods rely on static narratives or probabilistic models, which fail to capture the dynamic, interacting, and nonexclusive nature of competing futures. This paper introduces a quantum-inspired framework for scenario interaction grounded in the mathematical formalism of superposition, interference, and contextuality. Agents are modeled as epistemic learners who iteratively update their preferences across multiple narrative pathways, which are treated as basis states in a conceptual Hilbert space. The simulation combines reinforcement learning with stochastic imitation, producing emergent distributions that resemble quantum-like collapse under feedback. Central to the model is the emergence of symmetries in the scenario structure and learning dynamics. Agents begin with neutral priors, facing a balanced reward landscape, epistemic and normative symmetry that is gradually broken through adaptive behavior. However, statistical symmetries persist at the ensemble level, as agents maintain partial preferences and oscillate among futures. These layered symmetries reflect both the cognitive realism of foresight practices and the mathematical tractability of quantum-inspired systems. The proposed model bridges strategic foresight, game-theoretic interaction, and quantum cognition, and offers a novel computational lens to study how futures are constructed, selected, and stabilized under uncertainty.
Lomis et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: