Abstract Background Older nursing home residents (NHRs) typically present with multiple comorbidities and high frailty, necessitating careful management to avoid potentially avoidable hospital transfers . International reports indicate that between 6.8 % and 45.7 % of NHRs are transferred to acute hospitals over variable follow-up periods . Such transfers carry increased risks of in-hospital complications, including pressure ulcers, nosocomial infections, delirium, functional decline, and substantial healthcare costs. Moreover, nearly 40 % of care home residents who die in hospital do so within 24 hours of admission, suggesting that many transfers may be inappropriate. Methods To characterize referral processes and outcomes, we performed a retrospective chart analysis audit of 38 consecutive NHR admissions to our model 3 hospital over a 30 day period. Results The cohort’s mean age was 83 years. Sepsis accounted for 50% of admissions, with falls, delirium, acute kidney injury, and lower respiratory tract infections also common. 35% of referrals occurred at weekends, and 50% of weekday referrals were out-of-hours. Only 10 % underwent in-person general practitioner review and 20 % had telephone assessment before transfer. Transfer documentation was complete in 12 % of cases, incomplete in 65 %, and absent in 23 %, while 90 % had full medication lists. Advance directives precluding hospital admission existed for 13 % of admissions. In-hospital mortality within 24 hours occurred in 5 % of admissions, 15 % were discharged on oral therapy within 24 hours, and 27 % were readmitted within 30 days. Conclusion These findings highlight significant deficiencies in pre-transfer clinical review and communication, particularly during out-of-hours periods, underscoring the need to strengthen community-based care pathways, standardize documentation, and ensure timely GP involvement to reduce avoidable hospitalizations in this vulnerable population.
Hina et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: