The article analyzes the systemic problems of implementing concession agreements in the field of water infrastructure in Russia, using the example of a failed project in Saratov. The authors show how the lack of a balance between the interests of the investor, the state, and society leads to project failures, losses, and a decline in the quality of services. In response, they propose a model of "balanced concession" based on transparent pricing, fair risk distribution, linking payments to the achievement of key sustainable development indicators, and an active role for the state as a competent partner. This approach helps to increase the investment attractiveness of the industry, modernize outdated infrastructure, and protect public and environmental interests.
Batueva et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: