The concept of minority is a highly significant concept that attracts widespread attention across many social science fields. However, because it is often used for the purpose of othering, it can carry negative connotations. In fact, there is a considerable amount of theoretical knowledge surrounding this concept, which is frequently used to define boundaries in identity definitions. However, examining the creation of minority identities through othering, using a process-based, relational sociological approach that rejects essentialism, has gained even more importance today. This is because, instead of being defined by a single characteristic, identities are now increasingly diversified, resulting from a multitude of statuses and roles held at intersections. In parallel with this, the social value of being a minority or a member of the majority can also change, so this article attempts to examine the concept of minority as a dynamic and uncertain concept rather than a static and essentialist one. Furthermore, examples from Turkey and around the world are explored, highlighting how immigrant identities are marginalized through the labeling of minority. Thus, the article points out that the relevant literature is replete with examples demonstrating that the concept of minority is frequently used in the construction of hegemonic relations, not only sociologically but also politically.
Dr. Aytul Kasapoglu (Mon,) studied this question.