What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to clarify evaluation hooks for ensuring the robustness of Decision-OS V6.

synapse

⌘+K

synapse

⌘+K

January 16, 2026Open Access

Decision-OS V6 Addendum: Evaluation Hooks for PIC — Verification Note (1p)

Key Points

The aim is to clarify evaluation hooks for ensuring the robustness of Decision-OS V6.
Introduced metrics for audit-agreement, idempotence-break rate, and drift-resistance.
Used a toy example to illustrate the order-invariance in merging processes.
Applied a protocol involving AB tests with cross-over for reproducible evaluations.
No specific results reported; focuses on evaluation mechanisms rather than outcomes.

Abstract

This 1-page addendum makes explicit evaluation hooks that were implicit in Decision-OS V6 (PIC). Purpose: - Order-invariance (phase-invariant merge under permutation) - Audit-agreement (independent auditors converge on the same canonical state) - Drift-resistance (stability under small context perturbations) Contents (no results reported): - Toy example showing Canon (ΔA ⊔ ΔB) = Canon (ΔB ⊔ ΔA) - Metrics: audit-agreement, idempotence-break rate, drift-resistance- Protocol: AB + cross-over for reproducible evaluation- Falsify condition and non-guarantees GitHub (source-of-truth): - notes/v6-addendum/DecisionOSV6AddendumVerificationNote₁p. pdf

Read Full Paperexternally

Mark Helpful

Bookmark

Relay

View Full Paper