Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This addendum evaluates verification aspects in software, indicating implications for reliable assessments.
This 1-page addendum makes explicit evaluation hooks that were implicit in Decision-OS V6 (PIC). Purpose:- Order-invariance (phase-invariant merge under permutation)- Audit-agreement (independent auditors converge on the same canonical state)- Drift-resistance (stability under small context perturbations) Contents (no results reported):- Toy example showing Canon(ΔA ⊔ ΔB) = Canon(ΔB ⊔ ΔA)- Metrics: audit-agreement, idempotence-break rate, drift-resistance- Protocol: AB + cross-over for reproducible evaluation- Falsify condition and non-guarantees GitHub (source-of-truth):- notes/v6-addendum/Decision_OS_V6_Addendum_Verification_Note_1p.pdf
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shinichi Nagata (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: