This record presents a full-length, formally structured scientific article that rewrites and expands a set of core ontological propositions from Vidamor Cabannas’s Theory of Objectivity (TO) into a bicameral research program designed for disciplined dialogue with contemporary physics. The paper articulates TO as a modal–ontological grammar (Chamber A) while preserving modern physics as a quantitative and testable language of regimes (Chamber B). The analysis develops TO’s key categories—boundary lines, convergence zones, aura/field, induction, and total plasma—and maps them onto established physical frameworks, including quantum atomic theory and QED, nuclear physics via QCD and chiral EFT, general relativity and observational cosmology, and plasma physics/MHD. A central addition is a dedicated and extended treatment of Light as a TO phenomenic element, translated through three operational layers: Maxwellian electrodynamics, Planck–Einstein quantization, and cosmological constraints from the CMB and spectral distortions. Methodologically, the paper proposes an AI-assisted operational-bridge architecture: a set of testable “translation gates” structured as PASS/HOLD audits. Each bridge is required to specify (i) a target regime and observables, (ii) a differential prediction, and (iii) an explicit failure criterion, preventing semantic renaming or unconstrained parameter tuning. The article provides a systematic roadmap of candidate empirical bridges (e.g., spectroscopy, medium effects, plasma transport, BAO/GW constraints), a failure-aware checklist, and a TO↔Physics glossary for reproducible interdisciplinary use. The work is intended as a rigorous template for transforming TO’s ontological claims into a controlled empirical-contact program, without positioning TO as a competing replacement for contemporary physics, but rather as a foundational modal framework capable of generating scientifically auditable bridges. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; modal ontology; boundaries; convergence zones; plasma; phenomenic elements; light; electromagnetism; gravitation; operational bridges; PASS/HOLD audit; AI-assisted methodology; empirical testability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vidamor Cabannas
Denivaldo Silva
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cabannas et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/696b2616d2a12237a934969c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18257428
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: