Article type: Opinion / Perspective This opinion article argues that, although pandemic preparedness plans appropriately prioritise individuals with comorbidities for medical intervention, they largely overlook the ongoing stress experienced by high-risk populations. This oversight represents a significant biological issue. Chronic stress alters immune system regulation via neuroendocrine–immune pathways, leading to impaired control of inflammation and diminished antimicrobial responses. Drawing on examples from COVID-19 and high-risk groups, the article contends that structured support to reduce stress, including both clinical and community-based counselling, should be regarded as essential resilience infrastructure rather than optional assistance. The objective is not to replace medical care but to address a critical preparedness gap. This manuscript is a preprint and has not yet undergone peer review.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Frank Chilombolwa Nyondo
University of Zambia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Frank Chilombolwa Nyondo (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ff08c1c9540dea811ab8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18443486
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: