With its advantages such as large capacity, punctuality and low environmental impact, the metro has become one of the primary means of alleviating urban traffic congestion. However, safety accidents still occur frequently during the construction of metro deep foundation pits. A review of domestic and international studies reveals that safety risk management for metro deep foundation pit construction remains insufficient, particularly in terms of comprehensive risk identification, analysis of risk interrelationships and systematic risk assessment. To improve the level of safety risk management in metro deep foundation pit construction, this study analyzes safety risk factors using Chinese word segmentation, AHP, ISM, and MICMAC methods. Based on text mining and literature review, a case database comprising 156 metro deep foundation pit construction safety accidents reports was established and integrated into a unified text corpus. Chinese word segmentation was then performed on the corpus, and through risk interpretation combined with relevant standards and codes, 29 safety risk factors were identified and classified into five categories: technology, management, material, personal and environment. On this basis, 22 main safety risk factors were extracted using the AHP method. The results indicate that management-related factors constitute the most critical type of safety risk. Subsequently, the ISM method was employed to identify the interactions among the main safety risk factors and to construct a five-level hierarchical model, in which the top level contains nine safety risk factors, while the bottom level consists of two factors. Through MICMAC analysis, the safety risk factors were classified into three categories, based on which a safety risk management framework for metro deep foundation pit construction was established, and specific control measures were proposed for six representative safety risk factors.
Guo et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: