This paper examines the cognitive and emotional foundations that lead human beings to construct, defend, and preserve narratives even when their incompleteness is acknowledged. Rather than addressing the truth or falsity of specific belief systems, the analysis focuses on why structured meaning is psychologically necessary for reflective consciousness. The work explores narratives as cognitive prostheses that stabilize experience under uncertainty, the emotional cost of absolute freedom, and the limits of liberation from bias. The paper positions narrative closure as an adaptive response rather than an intellectual failure, while highlighting the ethical and epistemic challenge of inhabiting meaning systems without absolutizing them.
Andres Sebastian Bonomi Aguirre (Tue,) studied this question.