This meta-analysis investigated endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) efficacy and safety versus best medical treatment (BMT), including intravenous thrombolysis or other treatments when applicable, in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with pre-stroke disability (mRS >2), a group frequently excluded from large vessel occlusion trials. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, systematic searches of PubMed, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases (inception-July 2025) identified English studies (≥4 patients) comparing EVT versus BMT. Data on all-cause mortality, return to baseline mRS, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) were extracted. OR with 95% CI was estimated via a random-effects model. Five studies (1400 patients; 897 EVT and 503 BMT) with pre-stroke mRS 2–4 were included. EVT significantly reduced all-cause mortality (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29–0.82, p = .007), demonstrating moderate heterogeneity (I 2 = 66.9%). It also improved return to baseline mRS (OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 2.02–6.09, p < .001) with negligible heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%). sICH was more frequent in EVT (OR: 2.24, 95% CI: 0.84–5.94) but not statistically significant ( p = .11). EVT offers survival benefits and increased return to baseline functional status for AIS patients with pre-stroke disability, without definitively increasing sICH. Prospective studies are crucial for informing inclusive clinical guidelines.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lucca Tamara Alves Carretta
Mariana Letícia de Bastos Maximiano
Rudolfh Batista Arend
The Neuroradiology Journal
University of Arizona
Universidade Federal do Piauí
Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Carretta et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698ebf3485a1ff6a9301674e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009261423695