What does this research mean for the field?

A stability boundary for Probabilistic Sweet Spots (PSS) in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is defined, indicating the minimum patient and stimulation counts required for geometrically stable PSS. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.NOVEL_FINDING. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

To evaluate how patient numbers and stimulation counts affect the reliability of probabilistic stimulation maps in DBS.

February 16, 2026Open Access

Towards robust probabilistic maps in Deep Brain Stimulation. exploring the impact of patient number, stimulation counts, and statistical approaches

VBVittoria Bucciarelli DVDorian Vogel KWKarin K WårdellLinköping University

Key Points

To evaluate how patient numbers and stimulation counts affect the reliability of probabilistic stimulation maps in DBS.
Analyzed two patient cohorts for deep brain stimulation
Employed Bayesian t-test and Wilcoxon test methods
Evaluated geometric stability of probabilistic sweet spots
Identified a non-linear relationship between patient numbers and stimulation counts
Established a stability boundary for robust probabilistic maps
Bayesian t-test demonstrated reliability with smaller sample sizes (approximately 15 patients)

Abstract

Introduction Probabilistic Stimulation Maps (PSMs) are increasingly employed to identify brain regions associated with optimal therapeutic outcomes in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). However, their reliability and generalizability are challenged by the limited size of most patient cohorts and the inherent variability introduced by different statistical methods and input data configurations. This study aimed to investigate the geometrical variability of Probabilistic Sweet Spots (PSS) as a function of both the number of patients (nPat) and the number of stimulations per patient (nStim), and to model a stability boundary defining the minimum data requirements for obtaining geometrically stable PSS. Methods Three statistical approaches–Bayesian t -test, Wilcoxon test with False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction, and Wilcoxon test with nonparametric permutation correction–were applied to two patient cohorts: a primary cohort of 36 patients undergoing DBS for Parkinson’s Disease (PD), and a secondary cohort of 61 patients treated for Essential Tremor (ET), used to assess generalizability. Stimulation test data was collected intra-operatively for the first cohort and post-operatively for the second one. Geometric stability was evaluated based on variability in PSS volume extent and centroid location. Results The analysis revealed a non-linear trade-off between nPat and nStim to yield stable PSS. A stability boundary was defined, representing the minimum combinations of nPat–nStim required for anatomically robust PSS. Among the tested methods, the Bayesian t -test achieved stability with smaller sample sizes (∼15 patients) and demonstrated a consistent performance across both cohorts. In contrast, the Wilcoxon-based methods showed variable behavior between cohorts, which differed in symptom type and testing phase (intra-operative testing vs. post-operative screening). Discussion The proposed PSS stability boundary provides a practical reference for designing DBS studies and stimulation screening protocols aimed at probabilistic mapping. The Bayesian t -test emerged as a reliable method across both cohorts, supporting its potential in studies with limited sample sizes and scenarios where the method needs to be readily generalized to varying symptoms. These findings underscore the importance of considering both cohort size and stimulation count in probabilistic DBS mapping and call for further investigation into method-specific sensitivities to clinical and procedural factors.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper