This paper examines the evolving judicial interplay around the constitutional identity clause enshrined in Article 4(2) TEU, as articulated through the recent jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). It posits a perceivable doctrinal shift wherein the CJEU, moving from a traditionally deferential posture, now asserts a more centralized and stringent interpretive authority over claims of constitutional identity advanced by Member States. Through analysis of landmark rulings, the article contends that the Court is actively constructing a supranational “EU constitutional identity” grounded in Article 2 TEU values, thereby circumscribing the scope for domestic constitutional reservations and recalibrating the constitutional architecture of the Union towards enhanced juridical cohesion.
Gerasimos Lefkaditis (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: