ABSTRACT This article develops the concept of ‘AI resignation’ to capture how young people encounter AI not only as a helpful or flawed tool, but as an overpowering and seemingly inevitable force that can foreclose their sense of political and personal power to act in relation to the future. Building on qualitative work with high school students in Germany (ages 15–18), we conceptualize AI resignation as a future‐oriented sensibility that emerges at the intersection of pervasive data‐driven infrastructures and hegemonic narratives of AI inevitability. Drawing on Foucault's late work on subjectivation and subjectivity, as well as extensions in media and affect theory, we identify four contradictory pulls that structure adolescents' everyday engagements with AI—between enthusiasm and dependency, effortless access and eroded learning, self‐governance and repeated failure, aspiration and foreclosed futures—and show how these double binds gradually hollow out experiences of self‐efficacy. We further argue that AI resignation fulfils a strategic affective function within digital capitalism: by naturalizing dependence on predictive AI infrastructures and normalizing diminished expectations of the power to act, it stabilizes the very sociotechnical structures that produce it. The article concludes by outlining implications for re‐politicizing AI and education, emphasizing power‐critical curricula and collective spaces of reflection that enable young people to meaningfully participate in shaping sociotechnical futures.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jan‐Philipp Siebold
Annemarie Witschas
Rainer Mühlhoff
Future Humanities
Osnabrück University
Hochschule Osnabrück
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Siebold et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6997fa03ad1d9b11b3452e9f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fhu2.70026