We present an exhaustive morphological census of prime-generating integers n for the polynomial Q (n) = n⁴⁷ − (n−1) ⁴⁷ over the continuous domain n ∈ 1, 2×10⁹. The survey identifies 18, 473, 571 probable primes classified into four morphological types: 18, 121, 562 solitary primes, 173, 351 pairs, 1, 749 triplets, and 15 quadruplets (four consecutive integers each generating a probable prime of 341–430 digits). Key results: (1) Discovery of a 15th quadruplet at n = 23, 159, 557, previously absent from all published catalogs, recovered by filling the 10⁶, 10⁸ data gap. (2) Modular-3 Exclusion Principle: We prove that Q (n) ≡ 1 (mod 3) universally, rendering Q (n) +k composite for every offset k ≡ 2 (mod 3). This eliminates one-third of all candidate positions — including the right twin-prime slot k = +2 — establishing an intrinsic left–right chirality in the satellite field. (3) Geodesic Rigidity: The pair-to-solitary ratio R₂ (x) decays only ~7% over 0. 5×10⁹, 2×10⁹, significantly slower than the ~11% predicted by random independence models, confirming that constellation structure is arithmetically protected. (4) Asymptotic Validation: The observed ratio decay matches the Bateman–Horn prediction R (n) ~ K/ln (n) to within 1 percentage point (14% predicted vs. 15% observed over a factor-of-20 range). (5) Conditional Neighborhood Sieve: A formally defined search space S = Q (n) −k | n ∈ C₄, k ∈ 2, R, k ≢ 2 (mod 3) that exploits chirality and conditional density for deep-space surveys beyond n = 10¹¹. This repository contains the full paper (LaTeX source + compiled PDF), three publication-quality figures, the complete per-bin census data, the 15-quadruplet catalog, and the Python algorithms (exhaustive multi-core sweeper and chirality-aware deep-space radar) used in the survey.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ruqing Chen
Zhejiang Normal University
Energoservis (Czechia)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ruqing Chen (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69994cb3873532290d021566 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18701354
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: