Existing LLM-based approaches remain limited by simplistic task execution, restricted tool integration, and a lack of contextual reasoning when interacting with professional GIS software. This study investigates the efficacy of a multi-agent architecture designed to enhance geospatial task execution accuracy through collaboration, reasoning and tool-use. The architecture integrates Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and employs specialized agents that collaboratively translate high-level natural language queries into structured, executable workflows using QGIS processing algorithms as tools. Through a structured fine-tuning approach, we evaluated how the multi-agent setup influences spatial task comprehension, geoprocessing tool selection, and code generation. The results demonstrate that the developed framework significantly outperforms baseline single-agent and non-fine-tuned systems. For tasks involving one or two GIS tools, the system achieved up to 100% execution success and 87.5% semantic correctness. However, its effectiveness decreases with more complex, multi-step workflows. Notably, iterative self-refinement and self-debugging led to moderate gains in execution success and semantic correctness. The results indicate that multi-agent frameworks are a promising approach, even though improvements in reasoning depth and tool alignment are still needed. This study represents a foundational step toward more reliable, modular, and adaptable LLM-based systems for geospatial analysis automation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ali Mansourian
Rachid Oucheikh
Lund University
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Lund University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mansourian et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/699f95ba1bc9fecf3dab3e7a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2026.2633849