This research paper examines the growing integration of Artificial Intelligence into cyber law practice in India and its implications for advocate accountability, professional ethics, and legal liability. While AI tools enhance efficiency in legal research, drafting, evidence analysis, and compliance advisory, existing cyber law and professional conduct frameworks continue to impose absolute responsibility on advocates. The study analyses ethical risks arising from AI-assisted legal practice, including misinformation, confidentiality breaches, cyber negligence, and the improper delegation of legal judgment to algorithmic systems. It further explains why AI cannot function as a defence against professional liability under Indian law, as accountability remains strictly human-centric. Drawing from Indian legal frameworks and comparative international developments, the paper proposes a structured and practical reform approach for the ethical integration of AI into cyber law practice. It argues that while technology may augment legal work, professional responsibility, verification duties, and ethical judgment cannot be automated.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ramakrishna Semaladhari
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ramakrishna Semaladhari (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe39d95ddcd3a253e7905 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18762283
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: