Cheap coherence has become a defining condition of modern life: AI systems and institutional media can generate fluent, stance-aligned narratives at scale, making “sounding true” easier than remaining in contact with what is true. Structural Dynamics formalizes this as a systems theory of sovereignty and answerability under pressure. Building on the Structural Intelligence distinction between coherence (K) and contact (C), the paper models stability as a function of enforceable revision (Rv), binding (B), repair capacity (Rep), maintenance cost (M), invariance (I), fixed worth (W), and environmental viscosity (Dmim). It introduces dynamic operators—drift velocity (vD), contact half-life, and maintenance conservation (internal/exported/deferred)—and hardens the theory against gaming via irreversibility and witness/trace. A minimal audit protocol operationalizes the model across individuals, institutions, and AI-mediated systems, and a simulation note illustrates slow drift and threshold collapse in high-status institutions. Structural Dynamics is offered as a “physics of agency” in cheap coherence regimes: a compact grammar for predicting brittleness, detecting coherence-theater, and distinguishing correction that binds from correction that performs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vladisav Jovanovic
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vladisav Jovanovic (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a67f06f353c071a6f0ac71 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18826139