Falsifiability and Experimental Programme for Finite Reversible Closure Quantum Gravity - Paper 20

Falsifiability and Experimental Programme for Finite Reversible Closure Quantum Gravity - Paper 20 ABSTRACT Paper 19 completed parameter reduction for the holonomy–occupation curvature response and defined Quantum Gravity operationally within Finite Reversible Closure (FRC). Paper 20 exposes that framework to empirical risk. This paper separates microscopic implementation tests from observational tests, derives measurable deviation templates from the curvature response structure, defines a gravitational running parameter and identifies independent predictions beyond calibration to measured coupling. Explicit failure conditions are listed. The framework now stands structurally falsifiable. INTRODUCTION The Finite Reversible Closure (FRC) programme derives matter, gauge structure and curvature response from strictly local finite-dimensional reversible update. Paper 17 defined the density threshold separating dilute infrared regime from collapse.Paper 18 derived curvature response from holonomy statistics and occupation density without assuming prior geometry.Paper 19 reduced all dimensional constants to primitive scales and update-spectrum data, defining Quantum Gravity operationally as a parameter-closed response regime. Paper 20 answers the final structural question;- Where can this framework fail in real data? We distinguish; Implementation-level tests requiring explicit construction of the microscopic update U. Observable-sector tests independent of microscopic implementation details. Independent predictions are extracted beyond the single calibration needed to match measured Newton coupling.