Biofilm-associated infections represent a major therapeutic challenge due to reduced antimicrobial susceptibility and the limited predictive value of conventional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices with clinical outcome. A wide spectrum of experimental models has been developed to study biofilms, ranging from simple in vitro assays to ex vivo tissue-derived systems and in vivo infection models. Each category provides distinct advantages: in vitro platforms enable high-throughput compound screening and measurement of biofilm-specific indices such as MBIC and MBEC; ex vivo models preserve host tissue architecture and allow investigation of topical therapies and therapeutic windows; and in vivo systems are indispensable for analysing host-pathogen interactions and systemic PK/PD relationships. No single model is sufficient to replicate clinical biofilm complexity, but combined use and progressive standardization can improve translational value. This review provides a structured overview of available models, their PK/PD readouts and their strengths and limitations, aiming to guide model selection in preclinical biofilm research and antimicrobial development.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Supparitsch et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada885bc08abd80d5bb8ff — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkag091
Stephanie Supparitsch
Medical University of Vienna
Markus Zeitlinger
Medical University of Vienna
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Medical University of Vienna
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...