Accurate prediction of the energy yield of bifacial photovoltaic (PV) modules requires a proper evaluation of albedo irradiance and the associated mismatch losses. In this work, an advanced tool for the assessment of the power production of bifacial modules is presented. The tool benefits from a refined numerical evaluation of ground-reflected irradiance performed through a view-factor-based cell-level approach within a realistic three-dimensional (3D) Sun-module-shadow geometry. This allows capturing both vertical and lateral nonuniformities in the irradiance distributions over the module surfaces, which are neglected in conventional module-level models. The irradiances incident on the cells are subsequently supplied to a circuit-based block, operating with a cell-level granularity as well, which computes the I–V characteristics and the maximum power point (MPP) at selected time instants. Simulations performed on a simplified tool variant assuming uniform albedo irradiance show that this approximation leads to a non-negligible overestimation of power output. An extensive comparison against state-of-the-art tools, including the previous version of our framework, allows us to conclude that the proposed method is especially advantageous for standalone modules or short-row configurations under medium-to-high albedo conditions. Moreover—like its previous version—the tool can handle a large variety of detrimental effects, namely, partial architectural shading, localized snow coverage, bird droppings, and faulty cells. Additionally, a non-zero elevation from the ground can be effectively described. It is also found that south-oriented 30°-tilted bifacial modules suffer from appreciable albedo-induced mismatch losses on the rear surface during summer under medium-albedo conditions, whereas vertically-mounted West- and East-oriented configurations are less affected by such losses. Experimental validation confirms the accuracy of the proposed framework.
Riso et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: