Municipal infrastructure asset management in many West African contexts is characterised by fragmented data and limited analytical frameworks for evaluating cost-effectiveness. Existing models often fail to account for the hierarchical structure of municipal data, leading to potentially biased estimates. This study develops and applies a multilevel regression modelling approach to measure the cost-effectiveness of municipal infrastructure asset management systems. The objective is to quantify the influence of municipal-level and project-level factors on lifecycle cost performance. A hierarchical dataset was constructed from municipal records, comprising project-level cost data nested within municipalities. A two-level random intercepts model was specified: y₈₉ = ₀ + ₁X₈₉ + u₉ + e₈₉, where u₉ N (0, ^2ₔ) and e₈₉ N (0, ^2₄). Parameter estimation used restricted maximum likelihood with robust standard errors. Municipal institutional capacity explained 34% of the variance in cost-effectiveness. A one-unit increase in a standardised capacity score was associated with a 17% reduction in normalised lifecycle costs (95% CI: 12% to 22%). Project-level material sourcing strategies were also a significant predictor. The multilevel approach successfully disentangled municipal and project effects, demonstrating that institutional factors are a major driver of cost performance in infrastructure asset management. Municipal authorities should prioritise investments in institutional capacity building. National policy should mandate structured data collection to enable regular application of such hierarchical performance analyses. asset management, multilevel modelling, cost-effectiveness, municipal infrastructure, lifecycle costing This paper provides a novel methodological framework for analysing hierarchically structured infrastructure data, yielding actionable insights for improving fiscal efficiency in municipal engineering.
Diallo et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: