This study examines the readiness of Saudi higher education institutions for the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA) accreditation through a document-based, exploratory analysis of strategic plans, self-studies, annual program reports, and compliance review reports. The analysis is guided by NCAAA accreditation standards and selected international quality assurance benchmarks to assess institutional preparedness and alignment with these standards. The evaluation covers eight criteria: strategic planning, integrity and transparency, teaching and learning, students, faculty and staff, institutional resources, research and innovation, and community and partnerships. Findings indicate progress in faculty development and infrastructure but reveal a weak alignment between educational outcomes and job market needs, with varying quality across institutions. Although institutions largely meet international accreditation standards, adaptations are required for the local context. The study recommends strengthening strategic leadership, establishing continuous improvement systems, and fostering collaborations with regulatory and institutional bodies to ensure sustainable accreditation compliance and support universities in achieving national and international quality objectives.
Braima et al. (Wed,) studied this question.